Yet in the sidra which we read in the week of his birthday and his Yahrzeit, his name is omitted. Further, no-one knows his burial place, and the Pesach Haggadah does not mention him apart from an incidental quotation.
There is a similar, but even more difficult puzzle when we read the Megillah and find that here it is God Himself who does not rate a mention. (Only one other Biblical Book contains no Divine name, Shir HaShirim, though there is an oblique reference in chapter 8, verse 6.) Many theories explain the omission of God from the Book of Esther, but perhaps the best is that the Divine Presence is evident at every turning point in the story and therefore God is there even if not by name.
Similarly with Moshe Rabbenu. He is there wherever we look in Judaism, even when not specifically named. His teaching breathes his spirit, even when not quoted b’shem om’ro. Any view of Moshe Rabbenu requires superlatives. Ahad Ha’Am has a famous essay in which he asks: “What, essentially, was Moses?” He proceeds to examine all the epithets that history accords him (military hero, statesman, lawgiver, etc.) finally reaching the conclusion that (as the Rambam had already insisted) Moses was a prophet.
All very impressive, but because Ahad Ha’Am lived so many decades ago he could not have shared the extra assessment of our generation – that Moshe was great because he came in from the cold as a ba’al teshuvah returning to his roots.
Lester Seligman says in an essay on Theodor Herzl: “The leadership of underprivileged groups has often been drawn from ‘outsiders’. Herzl was such an outsider – an assimilated Western intellectual who returned, following the classic example of the outsider who became a leader – Moses. The fact that the leader is a stranger helps to win him acceptance. As Shmarya Levin said, had Moses risen from the ranks of the enslaved Jews to urge them to free themselves he would have been rejected.”
The erstwhile outsider sees with greater perspective. He is free from the hang-ups of the insider. He is driven by a passion. He knows the ways and idiom of the rulers who will be crucial to the task. His broad experience is useful. His willingness to leave the palace to be with his people intrigues and inspired them.
All this is part of the uniqueness of Moses.